Parents told to pay to see school curriculum

A message from Geraldine ‘Tincy’ Miller
State Board of Education District 12

 

Stay up-to-date on the
latest information
at TincyMiller.com

____________________________

     

     

____________________________

MONTHLY NEWSLETTERS:

APRIL 2013

MAY 2013
____________________________

VIDEOS:

Tincy Miller speaks on the
PERMANENT  SCHOOL FUND

____________________________

TINCY MILLER’S BLOG

____________________________

Contact ‘Tincy’ @

GTINCE@AOL.COM
972.419.4000

From the Office of the Attorney General…

Parents told to pay
to see school curriculum

Controversy over Texas program that described
Tea Party as terror escalates

A controversial school curriculum management system in Texas that once included a description of the Boston Tea Party as terror, and has referenced Islamic terrorists as freedom fighters, now has been found to be trying to charge parents hundreds of dollars to see the instructional materials being used by their own children, officials said.

However, under Texas Education Code Chapter 26, all parents have the undisputed right to see any and all instructional materials used in state classrooms.

The program is CSCOPE, and Amy Zimmerman, a mother in the Collinsville Independent School District, asked to see the 7th grade CSCOPE science lessons used between September 2012 and May 2013, citing her “parental right” under state law.
However, instead of the materials, what she got was a letter from an attorney for the district requiring the payment of $770 so see the materials.

Gerry Miller, an attorney with expertise in education law, said that doesn’t appear to align with the law.

“Suffice it to say the statute is mandatory because of the use of the word ‘shall,’ it is therefore incumbent on the school to comply with the parent’s request. No provision is made for payment by a parent as a ‘condition precedent’ to obtaining the teaching material,” Miller said.

“If a school district demands fees, especially exorbitant fees, to review teaching material, such action has the effect of invalidating the statute’s intent,” he said. “I would fully expect a judge to apply the statute as written and order the school to provide the information without charge.”

Miller also explained an added complication would be that property taxes have been used to support CSCOPE, which has faced heavy criticism by parents, teachers and legislators, culminating in hearings that revealed serious academic deficiencies in the areas of math, science and English, as well as what many critics believe is an agenda-driven bias in social studies content that promotes a negative view of America.

WND has reported on lessons claiming the Boston Tea Party was a terrorist act, and lessons requiring students to design flags for a new communist country.

Teachers also have told WND:

  • Lessons are not matched to grade level; a ninth-grade lesson asks students to circle capital letters in a sentence.
  • One social studies lesson teaches that capitalism is obsolete and communism is the best economic system, using a diagram that shows a man climbing a ladder towards communism.
  • A third-grade lesson defines American “equality” as “fair share.” Competing definitions that include “equality under the law” or “equal opportunity” are not discussed.
  • Muhammad is portrayed as a social justice crusader. There is no mention of his marriage to a young girl or his beheading of indigenous population groups.
  • Political parties are taught from what critics claim is a subjective and left-leaning perspective, e.g. Democrats “benefit each individual” while Republicans “favor big business.”
WND has also recently acquired lessons covering the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, teaching students that “medicine” and “food” are “rights,” and not a matter of personal responsibility.

Students who do not answer that “medicine” and “food” are “rights” have their answers marked as incorrect, sources report.

Other controversial lesson content includes a science lesson that instructs students to set things on fire in the middle of class and also lessons that promote anorexia and mercy death, according to Mary Bowen, a curriculum expert and teacher of 30 years who corresponds with WND.

CSCOPE also has come under fire for its secrecy and lack of transparency, forcing teachers and districts to sign “user agreements” – what whistleblowers say amount to “gag orders.” Teachers are exposed to legal liability if they share lesson content or other class materials with the general public, and threats of termination have been reported by teachers who attempt to engage parents about controversial CSCOPE content.

One result of legislative hearings was the suggestion for changes in user agreements, but sources have told WND that existing users are not included in any changes; they are only for new groups who want to sign up.

A CSCOPE program advising on the privacy requirements for the content notes users are required to not allow “unauthorized users to have online access … or gain permanent possession of … content.”

___________________________________________________________

Attorney General Abbott Sends Letter to TESCCC
Regarding Disclosure of CSCOPE Materials
May 6, 2013

Ms. Anne Poplin
Chair, Texas Education Service Center Curriculum Collaborative (TESCCC) Governing Board • 301 Loop 11 • Wichita Falls, Texas 76306

Dear Ms. Poplin:

It has come to our attention that school districts may be denying Texas parents access to CSCOPE curriculum and materials in violation of the Texas Education Code. Specifically, it has been alleged that school districts are improperly attempting to charge parents hundreds of dollars in order to access CSCOPE-related information that must be provided to them under Texas law.

As you know, Section 26.006(a) of the Texas Education Code provides that parents are “entitled to review all teaching materials, instructional materials, and other teaching aids used in the classroom of the parent’s child.” The Education Code also provides that school districts “shall make teaching materials and tests readily available for review by parents.” Further, Texas law specifically states that “A student’s parent is entitled to request that the school district…allow the student to take home any instructional materials used by the student.”

Notwithstanding the fact that Texas law clearly requires school districts to make educational materials accessible to parents, it is our understanding that school districts have recently attempted to charge hundreds of dollars for information related to the CSCOPE curriculum. To the extent parents are being charged a fee in order to access CSCOPE-related information, such a fee is not authorized by the Education Code.

In light of these concerns, we request that the TESCCC promptly notify school districts that information related to CSCOPE must be provided to parents in accordance with Chapter 26 of the Texas Education Code, which does not authorize the imposition of a fee. With summer fast approaching, it is imperative that the TESCCC distribute the notification requested herein immediately so that parents are assured access to CSCOPE-related information before the end of the school year. Finally, be advised that failure to comply with the Education Code’s disclosure requirements could result in legal action against school districts.

Sincerely,

Greg Abbott
Attorney General of Texas

cc: The Honorable Dan Patrick
Chairman, Texas Senate Committee on Education

Most timely and instructive content…
Respectfully,

TINCY MILLER
SBOE, Dist. 12

PLEASE CALL IN SUPPORT OF CSCOPE BILLS:

A message from Geraldine ‘Tincy’ Miller
State Board of Education District 12
Stay up-to-date on the
latest information
at TincyMiller.com____________________________          

____________________________

MONTHLY NEWSLETTERS:

MARCH 2013

APRIL 2013
____________________________

VIDEOS:

Tincy Miller speaks on the
PERMANENT  SCHOOL FUND

____________________________

TINCY MILLER’S BLOG

____________________________

Contact ‘Tincy’ @

GTINCE@AOL.COM
972.419.4000

PLEASE CALL IN SUPPORT OF CSCOPE BILLS:
SB 1406 • Senator Dan Patrick Houston  512-463-0107
SB 760 • Rep. Steve Toth Woodlands 512-463-0797

RESOLUTION

WHEREAS the State Board of Education values the rights the rights of parent to participate in the education of their children, including full access to the contents of lessons that are being taught pursuant to Chapter 26 of the Texas Education Code: and

WHEREAS CSCOPE is a curriculum management system that is being used by a large number of Texas school districts and includes optional instructional materials used by classroom teachers to cover the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills: and

WHEREAS in response to a request from several legislators as a result of concerns from parents, teachers and citizens of Texas, the Chair of the State Board of Education has appointed an ad hoc committee to oversee a review process of the content of Social Studies lessons offered by  CSCOPE: and

WHEREAS the officials at CSCOPE have volunteered to participate in the Social Studies review in order to address these concerns, and

WHEREAS the State Board of Education has initiated a review process for CSCOPE that closely follows the tried and true process used for instructional materials and that allows for input from teachers, parents, administrators and concerned citizens of Texas: and

WHEREAS as a result of materials undergoing the State Board of Education’s review process, teachers, parents, administrators, citizens and local school boards may be better informed as to the quality of content being used to prepare Texas schoolchildren for life beyond graduation; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, That the State Board of Education supports the right of local schools boards to make informed decisions as to what instructional materials they purchase, with the State Board of Education’s transparent review process providing valuable assistance in making that decision: and be it further

RESOLVED, That the State Board of Education stands ready to respond to any directive enacted by the Texas Legislature to address any concerns with CSCOPE or any other instructional materials in an effort to preserve local control, increase parental access, afford greater transparency and improve the quality  of  instructional  materials; and  be it  further

RESOLVED, That the State Board of Education encourages CSCOPE, and any other provider of instructional materials, to participate in the SBOE review process to ensure quality materials are being used and the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills are being taught in our classrooms; and be it further

RESOLVED, That the State Board of Education encourages the Texas Legislature to appropriate funds sufficient to cover the costs related to any voluntary review.
SBOE Members Approval:  April 19, 2013, Austin, Texas
Barbara Cargill, Chair;
Thomas Ratliff, Vice-Chair
Mavis B. Knight, Secretary
Pat Hardy, Tom Maynard, Sue Melton, Lawrence A. Allen, Jr., Geraldine “Tincy” Miller, Donna Bahorich, Marisa B. Perez,
David Bradley; Marty Rowley, Martha M. Dominguez, Ed.D.
________________________________________________________
Authored by: Senator Dan Patrick
Bill Number: TX83RSB • April 15, 2013
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT
relating to State Board of Education oversight of regional relating to State Board of Education oversight of regional management systems.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:SECTION 1.  Subchapter B, Chapter 8, Education Code, is amended by adding Section 8.0531 to read as follows:Sec. 8.0531.  INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS DEVELOPED BY A COLLABORATION OF REGIONAL EDUCATION SERVICE CENTERS.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter or Section 8.001(c), instructional lessons developed as part of a curriculum management system by a regional education service center, acting alone or in collaboration with one or more other regional education service centers, shall be subject to the same review and adoption process as outlined in Section 31.022.
SECTION 2.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.  If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2013.
________________________________________________________
Authored by: Representative Steve Toth
H.B. No. 760
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT
relating to State Board of Education oversight of regional education service center services and products concerning student curriculum.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:SECTION 1: Subchapter B, Chapter 8, Education Code, is amended by adding Section 8.0531 to read as follows:Sec. 8.0531 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION OVERSIGHT OF CURRICULUM-RELATED SERVICES AND PRODUCTS. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter of Section 8.001 (c), the State Board of Education shall maintain oversight and direction of the activities of regional education service center, acting alone in collaboration with one of more other regional education service centers, concerning any service or product related to student curriculum. (b) A regional education service center, either alone or in collaboration with one or more other regional education service centers, may not develop, administer, or provide or authorize the development, administration, or provision by a public or private entity of a service or product related to student curriculum without State Board of Education approval, including approval of the form and content of the service or product, regardless of whether the service or product is provided online, in print, or in person.

A most timely Resolution and Bills…
Respectfully,

TINCY MILLER
SBOE, Dist. 12

Texas’ Graduation Requirements Miss the Mark

A message from Geraldine ‘Tincy’ Miller
State Board of Education District 12
Stay up-to-date on the
latest information
at TincyMiller.com____________________________          

____________________________

MONTHLY NEWSLETTERS:

MARCH 2013

Download Printable Version
APRIL 2013 Update
____________________________

VIDEOS:

Tincy Miller speaks on the
PERMANENT  SCHOOL FUND

____________________________

TINCY MILLER’S BLOG

____________________________

Contact ‘Tincy’ @

GTINCE@AOL.COM
972.419.4000

ARTICLE FROM “TINCY’S BLOG”

Editorial in the Washington Post…
by Editorial Board, Published April 17

“Texas’ Graduation Requirements Miss the Mark”
WHEN TEXAS TOOK the nation’s lead a decade ago in putting new rigor into high school graduation requirements, some worried it would cause more students to drop out or increase the achievement gap between students of color and their white peers. The opposite has proved true: Graduation rates have increased, with the greatest growth occurring among low-income and minority students. Given such success, it’s bewildering that the state would roll back, as is now under serious consideration, these high standards.Working their way through the Texas Legislature are bills that would rewrite high school graduation requirements to reduce the number of end-of-course exams required for a diploma and loosen the required courses for graduation. Under the state’s current recommended course load, high school students (barring those who opt out with written consent from a parent and school counselor) must complete four years of coursework in English, mathematics, science and social studies. Under the revised requirements, a new “foundation” diploma would allow students to take more electives with lightened course requirements. No longer would Algebra II or advanced science courses be required.Supporters, including the state’s association of school boards, say state requirements have gone too far; the change will give students flexibility to take courses that better fit their interests and career plans. The state’s business community is split, with some of them (including the Texas Association of Business) siding with opponents who recognize the danger of retreating from high expectations. Students who take more rigorous courses learn more. Given increasing international competition, that’s critical for both those who go to college and those who don’t. A rigorous high school curriculum is the best preparation for college success and for providing the high-level knowledge and skills required in today’s jobs. Try getting a job as an auto technician or sheet-metal worker without proficiency in math or the ability to read and understand a technical manual.

If enacted, the measures promise to have a particularly pernicious effect on students from low-income families without college-educated parents. The National Council of La Raza and the Education Trust, advocates for poor and minority students, have labeled the proposed changes “a retreat from progress” that would take Texas “back to the bad old days of pervasive tracking.”
The legislation, approved by the Texas House of Representatives, is pending in the Senate. It’s unclear where Gov. Rick Perry (R) stands; a spokesman said that the governor supports efforts to reexamine how high school students are prepared and evaluated but also that “he will protect the academic rigor that prepares students for career and college.” Retreating from a path the state blazed — particularly when other states are following with toughened graduation requirements — will hurt Texas and many of its children.

A most timely and instructive article…
Respectfully,

TINCY MILLER
SBOE, Dist. 12

Doing a Texas Two-Step Around Education Reform

Doing a Texas Two-Step Around Education Reform

The Wall Street Journal March 9-10, 2013

“Watering down new high school graduation standards will short change students, employers and the country”

For decades, policy makers have gone back and forth adopting the latest fads in school reform without any measurable improvements in learning.  The latest trend in Texas is to de-emphasize the liberal arts and increase instructional time spent in math, science and technology.

As the Texas legislature convened last month, a coalition of anti-testing organizations, including Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessment, promoted a plan to gut the state’s tough new high school graduation standards. Instead of passing 15 end-of-course exams, a student would graduate by passing two or three.  More than 800 Texas school boards have adopted a resolution to water down requirements.

We disagree, States across the country are increasing graduation standards, and Texas cannot afford to water down its own. A proposal to eliminate exams in world geography and world history as a graduation requirement, for instance, is shortsighted. Ever-lower expectations lead to one predictable outcome: a profound ignorance of the world among young people in an era when international events and evolving fiscal and trade policies have a personal impact on communities, businesses and individuals in every corner of the U.S.

Who hasn’t heard or seen the signs of this ignorance?  To cite one of many now-familiar results, there is the 2008 report “Still at Risk, What Students Don’t Know, Even Now”, by Frederick Hess.  It found that nearly 25% of 17 year-olds surveyed nationwide could not identify Adolf Hitler. More than 25% believed Christopher Columbus set sail for the New World after 1750.  Forty percent could not place World War I as occurring between 1900 and 1950.  Nearly 40% could not identify the Renaissance as the period in European history noted for cultural and technological advances.

Allowing young people to graduate as historical or geographical illiterates is myopic for another reason. Training them for getting jobs is not good enough; graduates of public schools are also citizens. Ask any physician today whether politics affects his livelihood.

We have a different approach to equipping students to face the future, one that has the weight of millennia of human experience behind it: a rigorous classical education. Such an education (called liberal-arts at the college level) does not shortchange math and science.  On the contrary, those subjects are studied with more rigor than can be seen in today’s public schools.

Students also learn the fundamentals of English grammar; American and world history through the reading of primary source documents; and the great stories of human struggle and yearning told by the greatest storytellers – Homer, Shakespeare, Milton, and Melville.

They study the principles of liberty and self-government as articulated by the Founding Fathers and the ennobling beauties found in painting, sculpture and song. Yes, the children have to learn Latin, too, just as the Founding Fathers did, because that language gives the greatest insight into the vocabulary and grammar of our own tongue and the Romance languages, including Spanish.

Certainly America needs as many engineers and computer scientists as the country requires in the 21st century. But that does not describe what lies ahead for the vast majority of young people entering the marketplace. The most common complaints of American employers are that job applicant and recent hires lack communication skills and higher-level thinking skills.  More plainly, many applicants cannot read a memo, they cannot express themselves in speech or in writing, they lack the ability to think through difficult problems.

We think that students who have been taught to write forcefully by studying Shakespeare and Tom Paine, who have learned to speak by studying the speeches of Cicero and Abraham Lincoln, who have learned to think through difficult problems by studying the Constitution through an analysis of the Federalist Papers, and who revel in the rigors of Latin grammar will have no difficulty in reading the boss’s memo.

Training young people in the liberal arts and sciences also will better prepare them to become “the boss” when it is time for the present cohort of bosses to retire. Those on the front lines of hiring employees in this state see the need for a classical education. Now parents are increasingly demanding such an education for their children.  We know this in part because the number of schools that have come to Hillsdale College each spring in search of graduating seniors to recruit as teachers of classical subject has more than doubled in the past five years.

Before long, we will begin to see how well the approach works. Responsive Education Solutions (ResponsiveEd), the largest charter-school system in Texas, in collaboration with Hillsdale College, is providing students the opportunity to receive a rigorous classical education tuition-free.  Founders Classical Academy is a public charter school that opened near Dallas in August 2012. The response has been almost overwhelming. The school initially started with 450 students and will educate more than 700 next year.

Classical-curriculum schools in other states, such as Ridgeview Classical Schools in Colorado, generally have waiting lists of over a thousand applicants.  The graduates of such programs go on to college to study the liberal arts and sciences.  Typically, the biggest complaint of these graduates is that their freshman courses were too easy.

As ResponsiveEd and Hillsdale College continue to open classical schools across the country, we want to see other schools, including noncharter public schools, brought up to serious level of accountability as well.

Jobs do not create the human mind, the human mind creates jobs. As a result, the very best education-the kind the Founding Fathers had-is what will produce good workers and good citizens. The challenge for those who want to eliminate testing in world history and geography or other subjects in Texas is to explain how students are prepared for a global economy when they are not required to learn anything about either the globe or the economy.

 

Mr. Cook is CEO of ResponsiveEd, a

Charter-school district with over 60

Schools in Texas. Mr. Moore is a Hillsdale

College professor of history who

Advises the college’s Barney Charter

School Initiative

A most timely and instructive article…

Respectfully,
Tincy Miller

SBOE, Dist. 12

Gtince@aol.com

 

Teacher Speaks Out Against CSCOPE

Click here to read article

March 2013 Newsletter

Dear Friends,

 

It is great to be back on the State Board of Education! Our first meeting of the year was held on January 31, 2013 and ran through February 1, 2013 in Austin, Texas. On Friday, February 1, 2013, Governor Rick Perry brought greetings and thanked the board members for their service. The State Board of Education consists of 15 members and of these 15 members the board welcomed 8 new members, which is the biggest turnover since 1989.

 

New Members:

Martha Dominguez, Dist. 1; Ruben Cortez, Jr., Dist. 2; Marisa Perez, Dist. 3; Donna Bahorich, Dist. 6; Tom Maynard, Dist. 10; Tincy Miller, Dist. 12; Sue Melton, Dist. 14; Marty Rowley, Dist. 15.

 

Appointments and Assignments:

Barbara Cargill, Chair of the SBOE (appointed by the Governor), is up for confirmation by the Senate, and the board elected Thomas Ratliff as Vice -Chair and Mavis Knight as Secretary.

 

Committee assignments were counted and determined in front of the whole board.

Instruction: Maynard, Melton, Dominguez, Miller and Perez.

PSF/Finance: Hardy, Allen, Bradley, Mercer and Ratliff.

School Initiatives (Charter Schools): Bahorich, Rowley, Cargill, Cortez, and Knight.

 

Terms of Office:

Staggered terms with 7 members serving two-year terms and eight members serving 4-year terms.

Members drawing four-year terms: Bahorich, Cargill, Dominguez, Maynard, Melton, Mercer, Ratliff and Rowley.

Members drawing two-year terms: Allen, Bradley, Cortez, Hardy, Knight, Miller and Perez.

 

Topics of Interest:

  • The Permanent School Fund including finance updates on investments.
  • HB 1942, 2011 Regular Legislative Session, amending Health Education TEKS to include bullying prevention to the student expectation (first reading and filling authorization).
  • CSCOPE
    • Sen. Dan Patrick, Chair of Senate Education, sent out the results of the hearing on CSCOPE.
    • Highlights: An agreement that more transparency will happen with the governing board of CSCOPE. The governing board will begin a review process with the SBOE beginning with Social Studies, removing civil or criminal penalties with the release of CSCOPE content. All CSCOPE lessons may be posted by teachers and districts, posting lesson content to their website, creating a standing curriculum review panel comprised of parents, teachers, school administrators, members of the SBOE, and TESCCC members.
    • SBOE Chair, Cargill said: “I appreciate CSCOPE’s willingness to address concerns brought to light recently. The SBOE looks forward to working with them to resolve these issues, so CSCOPE can remain a useful tool for participating school districts.”
  • Proclamation 2015 discussion begins: Social Studies, Math, and Fine Arts.
  • Other issues of concern: SB6, 2011 Regular Legislative Session, which weakened Texas’ review and adoption process of textbooks by allowing state funds to bypass the SBOE rigorous adopting process, creating no transparency and no provision for easy public access or input.

 

 

 

The next board meeting will take place April 17-19, 2013.

Please feel free to call or e-mail me if you have any questions or

concerns.

 

 

Respectfully,

Geraldine “Tincy” Miller

(972) 419-4000 (w)

Gtince@aol.com

www.TincyMiller.com

Tincy Miller


“I have always fought and will always fight to protect our dedicated Permanent School Fund for its original purpose.  This fund was established to pay for our children’s textbooks.  I will not allow the Permanent School Fund to be raided by politicians and special interest groups.”  ~ Geraldine “Tincy” Miller

Safeguarding our conservative Republican principles for 26 years on the State Board of Education…

Geraldine “Tincy” Miller is the conservative Republican representative for the State Board of Education, District 12. Serving from 1984-2010 and re-elected in 2012, with four of the years (2003-2007) as Chairman, appointed by Gov. Rick Perry and confirmed by the Senate and served out her full term plus an extra six months. She is an effective conservative leader on the State Board of Education.

Endorsed By:

“Tincy Miller is a lifelong conservative Republican who is dedicated to improving education in Texas and making our schools top quality. I urge everyone to join me in voting for Tincy Miller in the Republican Primary and return her to the State Board of Education, District 12.”

State Representative Will Hartnett, Dallas County

“We need more conservative leaders in Austin to protect Texas’ future. Tincy Miller will be a strong conservative voice for our state. She will bring this much needed voice to the State Board of Education. I ask you to join me in voting for Tincy in the April 3rd Republican Primary.”

State Representative Jodie Laubenberg, Collin County

“Tincy Miller is a long time conservative leader who has championed conservative causes as a member of the State Board of Education. I wholeheartedly endorse her.”

State Representative Jim Jackson, Dallas County

Cathie Adams

Dot Adler

Bill Ames

Benny Gordon

Penny Hajdu

Paul Hoffman

Larry Jeffus

Ken Paxton

Roger Staubach

Larry Steinberg

Peggy Venable

Jan Woody

The “Tincy” Miller record:

  • With a Master’s of Science Degree in Reading specializing in dyslexia,she was instrumental in the passage of the first Dyslexia Law in Texas (and in the Nation) to identify and remediate children with dyslexia and related learning disorders (1985)…teaching students to read, write, and spell.
  • Established the first state Dyslexia Handbook for parents and teachers (last update, 2010) and the first licensure law (2009).
  • From 1995-1997, the SBOE was mandated to update all K-12 subject-area courses. As a Christian and a phonics-trained teacher, Tincy saw this as a “God moment” to open the door for a major change in how schools teach reading. She helped facilitate and implement the first phonics-based “curriculum standards” in the history of the state. Thus began Gov. Bush’s “No Child Left Behind” with all children learning to read by third grade.
  • In 2003, as Chair of the SBOE, Tincy spoke to the Republican State Convention announcing: 98% of the first class of third graders to take the state phonics-based test passed. History was made! Phonics Works!
  • 2007-2008 updated Reading/Phonics ELA Curriculum Standards to current scientific research in Reading…adopted the new phonics textbooks (2010-2011).
  • After studying the textbook review and adoption process, Tincy recommended having teachers in their subject area-specialty review the books, results: finding and correcting 7,000 errors. Discovered that publishers were hiring liberal professors (and doctorate students) to write the chapters in the textbooks without truly editing the books: the board enforced better oversight of textbooks.
  • Discovered a “pay to play” scheme with The Children’s Textbook Fund (PSF)and during her Senate confirmation in 2003 reported: external managers were becoming rich on the backs of our kid’s while no value was added to the Fund. After her confirmation, as directed by the Senate, and under her leadership, the external managers were removed.
  • Over the 26 years, she worked hard to protect the Children’s Textbook Fund from “raids by Austin politicians…keeping it transparent and “squeaky” clean.”The Fund valued at $24 Billion dollars, is considered one of the best educational endowment Funds in the nation. “I will not sacrifice the sacredness of the Children’s Textbook Fund.”
  • Textbooks need to be historically and factually accurate and not politically correct! History “curriculum standards” emphasize patriotism, the free enterprise system, our founding fathers, the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence and American exceptionalism.
  • In a unanimous vote by the SBOE: Tincy made sure that all theories in the New Science Textbooks would be taught. Encouraging students to think, ask, predict and have increased lab time.
  • Math textbooks, such as: Saxon Books, teach the basics – memorizing the multiplication/division table, discouraging calculators in elementary school.
  • Health textbooks need to uphold traditional definitions of marriage and family and abstinence-based sex education.

Besides serving as Chair from 2003-2007, Tincy served as Vice-Chair of the board, Chaired the Student Committee on Instruction, and as a member of the Permanent School Fund committee firmly defended it from legislative “raids”, guaranteeing that students have equal access to textbooks and insisted on stringent transparency standards in policy and budgetary decisions.

  • She advocates for immersion as the way to teach English to Hispanic Students. Although the bilingual program is mandated by the state, immersion needs to be mandated by the legislature
  • “Tincy” will bring back conservative, effective and concerned leadership to the State Board of Education…a vote for “Tincy” is a vote for children!

I welcome your suggestions, advice and support.

Geraldine “Tincy” Miller

Email me at Gtince@aol.com

What Exactly Does an SBOE Member Do? Read What the North Texas Reporter Has to Say…

Read this excellent explanation of what a State Board of Education Member does, published recently on the North Texas Reporter blog.

“The SBOE is NOT a salaried position! The board meets every two months and only travel expenses are reimbursed! Other than that, each board member must answer to their constituents and bear their own expenses. For the most part, they maintain their own means of income which makes the SBOE a part time job for many members.
Tincy Miller maintains her own office and support staff for her own well regarded family business involved in commercial real estate. This offers her District accessibility to communication and allows Mrs. Miller the flexibility to actively pursue her responsibilities to her District and to her SBOE agenda.”
North Texas Reporter, May 19, 2012

Click here to read more.

Tincy Miller and the Permanent School Fund YouTube

Click here to see Tincy Miller and the Permanent School Fund.

To see more videos click here

September 2010 Newsletter

Dear Fellow Friends and Educators,

The State Board of Education met last week for the first time this school year. Topics of discussion included textbook funding and a controversial resolution to keep a pro-Islamic bias out of future textbooks. However, the biggest triumph was the passage of an updated version to the Dyslexia Handbook, a goal I wanted to accomplish before I step down from the Board.

I created the Dyslexia Handbook shortly after joining the Board to give teachers an easy-to-use tool for teaching and understanding children with dyslexia. After dealing with the affects of my son’s dysgraphia (a form of dyslexia), I knew how easy it was for these children to fall through the cracks in school and never recover from it. Thereafter, I made it my primary aim to be an advocate for dyslexic children. I have worked with the top experts in the field to produce a resource that has the most up-to-date research on this issue. The Dyslexia Handbook has proven invaluable, giving teachers the information they need to observe success in these students.

We have updated the Dyslexia Handbook many times since it was created. While a more thorough revision of the Handbook will be made after the 82nd Legislature, these most recent updates were all based on changes to existing – or the creation of new – laws.

The proposed changes also incorporate new information related to recent scientific studies and best practices for diagnosing students with dyslexia. The recommendations were unanimously accepted by the Board. These proposed changes bring us one step closer to a time when all of Texas’ dyslexic students have a chance at educational achievement. To get a copy of the updated Handbook, which should be available soon, go to the TEA Web site at: http://www.tea.state.tx.us.

Perhaps the most complicated issue we faced last week was textbook funding because of the circumstances of the economy today. The State is forecasting an $18 billion shortfall, and the Governor, Lt. Governor and Speaker have asked that every state agency to cut their budgets by five percent for this biennium and cute their base for the next biennium by five percent while also bringing in 10 percent options. Consequently, the Education Commissioner, Robert Scott, announced that he is cutting Reading and Science textbooks out of the TEA’s budget.

The State Board of Education is given the task of overseeing the Permanent School Fund, and thus votes on the payout percentage, which is critical for funding textbooks. If they vote on a percentage that is too high, they risk depleting the Fund for future generations to come. Therefore, we must always be conservative in what we decide. The Committee on the Permanent School Fund voted on a 3.5 percent payout percentage for this year. So, with the cuts being made by the Commissioner, we had to make some tough decisions.

While we could not come up with a perfect solution, we settled on ordering supplemental science materials for the high school students. The high school students will be taking end-of-course exams for the first time this spring, and therefore need updated materials to prepare for their tests. While the 3rd through 8th graders will also be taking a new TEKS exam, their current materials do a better job of covering the necessary information for the test. This leaves it up to the local school districts to pay for any textbooks or materials not covered by the State. Commissioner Robert Scott assured the Board that students would not be tested on any subject for which they don’t have materials, opening the possibility that the new tests will be postponed until next year. Finally, the Board also voted to change the timeline for publishers to submit bids for textbooks and to open the bidding process in order to encourage competition and drive down the future cost of textbooks.

Perhaps the topic that received the most attention was a resolution that instructs publishers to reject textbooks with a pro-Islamic bias. The resolution narrowly passed by Board on a 7-6 vote (two members were absent).

The resolution was first presented to our Board in July by the man who lost his primary race against one of our incumbent board members from Lubbock. Apparently, his information came from old textbooks published in 1999 (prior to 9/11), along with an Advanced Placement college-level book that is not reviewed by the SBOE.

Some of us were surprised to see the resolution on our September agenda. When I realized the Chairman and/or the TEA had not checked the resolution for inaccuracies before placing it on our agenda, some of us tried to postpone and amend the resolution to make sure all books would reflect our new History TEKS for fairness, balance and accuracy. (A resolution is not binding and has no authority over future State Boards of Education.) No one on our board wants the World History books to be pro-Islamic bias and anti Christian…in fact, some of the publishers looked over the resolution at the meeting and found several errors.
Emotions led the final vote rather than thoughtful and rational reason. As a proud Reagan Christian Conservative, I could not vote for a resolution that had not been properly reviewed and checked for accuracy.

If you have any further questions, feel free to contact me via my Web site at http://www.tincymiller.com.

Wishing you a blessed and joyful new school year.

Geraldine “Tincy” Miller
State Board of Education, District 12
Member since 1984
Chair, 2003-2007